<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GPS &#8211; New Satellite SOG Errors?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.altendorff.co.uk/archives/244/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.altendorff.co.uk/archives/244</link>
	<description>sailing; navigation; electronics; computers; boat maintenance..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 12:32:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wackyracer</title>
		<link>http://www.altendorff.co.uk/archives/244/comment-page-1#comment-22949</link>
		<dc:creator>wackyracer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.altendorff.co.uk/archives/244#comment-22949</guid>
		<description>It appears that the GPS receievrs which did count from 0 to 31 may have casued a problem because there never was a PRN0 so the units can in fact only track 31 satellites instead of the 32 which are at &quot;healthy&quot; at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that the GPS receievrs which did count from 0 to 31 may have casued a problem because there never was a PRN0 so the units can in fact only track 31 satellites instead of the 32 which are at &#8220;healthy&#8221; at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

